I’d lose my geek cred if I didn’t review The Watchmen

Looking for some reading matter on the train last weekend I dug out my old dusty copy of The Watchmen. When I got to the station, I noticed another guy (a student maybe, from his age/ clothes) pulling a familiar looking yellow and black tome from a bag.

He looked over at me, grinned, and caught my eye. “Snap,” he said. We shared a smile. People in the UK don’t usually talk to strangers on trains. But some things transcend such minor local customs.

[Edited to add: mydeathknight notes below that in Scotland people are a lot friendlier. So it's mostly in London that we don't make eye contact with strangers.]

The Watchmen is one of the great literary works of the 20th century. The Watchmen is a graphic novel. The Watchmen is both a love letter to and a deconstruction of the superhero comic genre. The Watchmen is a kick up the 80s. The Watchmen takes you back into that world of cold war nuclear brinksmanship better than any other book I know. The Watchmen is one of the greatest morality tales ever written.

I was tempted to walk over to the (possible) student at the end of the journey and ask, “So, do you think he was right?” It is the same question that everyone asks themselves on finishing that book. But I didn’t, because we were both British soft southern gits.

This city is afraid of me, I have seen its true face

If Alan Moore’s book is a masterwork, Zack Snyder’s film is merely a flawed masterpiece. It is a paean to the book, an attempt to translate an unfilmable work to screen as closely as humanly possible. Fans of the book will enjoy the film. It isn’t quite a frame by frame translation but much of the familiar dialogue and action scenes are preserved. Rorschach is Rorschach, and “I did it 35 minutes ago.” We may carp about the film, complain about some of the material that was put in and some that wasn’t, and spare some wistful thoughts about the ideal genius film adaptation that will now never be made. But at the end of the day it was a brave attempt by a team who obviously love the original.

We have been waiting a long time (20 years?) for someone to make a ballsy, dark, violent film of The Watchmen. Not one that was safe and easy. Not one that was suitable for kids. And that, at least, we now have.

Some things really do work better on film than on the page. The violence is much more shockingly in your face. So is the sex. So is Dr Manhattan’s wedding tackle. The zeitgeist and background really comes clear when you watch that inspired opening credit sequence with the historical excerpts set to Dylan’s ‘The Times They Are A’Changin”. I think that was a stroke of utter genius and for that, if nothing else, I am already planning to go back and see the film again while it’s still on the big screen. The soundtrack in general was absolutely brilliant, cinematography was fantastic, the whole package was a treat to watch.

Another amusing addition was Lee Iacocca’s getting shot up by an assassin who was really after Veidt. Apparently not so amusing to the man himself though.

The acting was also generally good. Special props to Jackie Earle Hayley’s Rorschach who might as well have just stepped straight off the page. The whole deal is a visual treat for people who wanted to see the book brought to life. It’s almost note perfect.

Because the angle taken was a straight translation, some of the facets of the book which don’t work so brilliantly (or to be fair, they work brilliantly for what the writer was trying to do, they may not work so well for non-fans) are there in the film too. The storyline with its lurch towards crazy superhero cliches at the end in particular — a non-fan is going to wonder why the smartest man in the world couldn’t think of a better plan. But the book revolves around the reader buying that because of him being the person he was, it was the only possible way for him to proceed.

Unfortunately, although the story survived intact, the heart and soul of the book was left in shreds. The human side of the story fell to the wayside; and it’s a shame because Moore was making some important points when he compared the reaction of the human protagonists to each other to the antics of the costumed heroes. We also miss some of the subtler hints of character development and how and why the protagonists make some of the decisions that they do. We miss the Black Freighter. We miss the follow up on Rorschach’s psychologist and what happens to him as a result of the interactions. We miss seeing quite how narrow minded and monstrous Veidt has become in pursuit of his goals.

It’s a good film, don’t get me wrong. Maybe even a great one. But when you’ve seen it, go read the book.

It won’t be the same as reading it back when it was written and the fear of the world being destroyed in a nuclear holocaust didn’t seem so fanciful. It won’t be the same as reading it in a Europe that was caught geographically between two superpowers that might have been ready to sacrifice it to their own  cold war. If you don’t remember the early 80s, you won’t remember that fear (and that’s a good thing, by the way).

When you’ve read the book, discuss it with a total stranger on the train (unless you are in London). Then go see the film again. I know it’s what I am planning!

About these ads

12 thoughts on “I’d lose my geek cred if I didn’t review The Watchmen

  1. And I agree – I really do want to go see it again, and I want to buy the DVD of Black Freighter, so I can see what it could have been. I think it would have been hard to include the Freighter stuff in and keep any form of pacing, and I really LOVED the film, honestly I can’t imagine anyone doing it much better, because the true core of the novel is quite unfilmable.

    The acting really was superb throughout, and I was happy to see Bubastis!

  2. I think they did a pretty good job with the film. Most film tie-ins are so far removed from the original story that you sometimes wonder if it IS the same story.

    I never really got into Watchmen when it came out, probably because I had had enough of the bleak view of life so endemic in comic books in the 80s.

    Anti-heroes living in a degenerate society were nothing new back then; V in V for Vendetta, Axel Pressbutton, Vanth Dreadstar, most stories in magazines like Epic involved depressing endings or nihilism, heck even the Batman was getting the ‘life sucks’ treatment.

    I ditched all that for stuff like Cerebus the Aardvark, but I doubt they will be making a film about him any time soon!

    • If they do make a film of Cerebus, I hope it’s from before the bits where Dave Simms totally lost it and just did rant after rant about how much he hated women.

      • “Dave Simms totally lost it and did rant after rant about how much he hated women.”

        Fortunately I gave up reading Cerebus around the time of “Cerebus for Pope”. Tne civilised Barbarian no longer interested me by that time, even though the whole election campaign storyline was very clever and funny.

        Perhaps he was more hating his ex than women in general. /shrug.

        It seems a lot of comic book writers have problems with their emotions or fitting into society.

  3. As a Scot, who moved to Surrey for more money, better job, I commute about the greater London area. I was shocked at how eye contact or even smiling at someone on a train was interpretted as meaning you were somehow mentally ill or a threat to your fellow travellers!

    Doing the same kind of commute around the West Coast of Scotland is like being in a different world. People say hello and chat away to anyone who is even only half interested. Our loonies are a little more obvious I guess!!!

    I’m still not used to ‘the South’ now after a regular daily commute over the last 10 years. It’s not a ‘British’ issue ;)

    On your main theme, I remember watching ‘Threads’ back in the early 80’s, and hearing the sirens in the Frankie songs… I also remember reading the greatest graphic novel I’ve ever read, so I am a bit wary about the film. But like you, most fans seem to like what they have done. I’m hoping for an ‘uber’ DVD version with more scenes. Am I wrong to avoid this movie now?

    • Fair point. I’ll edit to make it clear that when I said British what I really meant was soft southern git :) London is incredibly unfriendly, almost to the point of freakishness.

      As far as avoiding it now? I think it’s definitely worth seeing on the big screen. It’s not the best adaptation it could have possibly been in the best of all possible worlds, but it’s a good film and if you’re like me and hadn’t read the book for awhile it’ll bring back fond memories. I’m sure there will be lots of extras and cut scenes in the DVD though, I plan to get that when it comes out.

  4. I loled @ your edit!

    Showed your post to a colleague, and he noted, that he thought the average Scotsman in London lived on a Park bench and was over fond of a drink or two, and would definitely not be someone he would share a conversation with on a train!

    He did conceed that he was proud of our ‘British’ Tennis players and Olympians!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s