<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When hunters go bad: The problem with non-negotiated instance groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/</link>
	<description>MMOs and game design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh Spinks, you&#039;re so sensible - don&#039;t you realise that this is a topic for widespread hysteria, didn&#039;t  you get the memo?

But I like this post a lot, especially because what irritated me particularly about the whole business (I don&#039;t give a damn how Frost behaves, tbh) was the lack of negotiation.  I mean all it needed was for people to actually respond to him.  It doesn&#039;t matter whether you believe it&#039;s appropriate to sign up to an instance and not want to do all the bosses, the point is Frost gave them ample time to tell them they were doing the whole thing and let him drop.

Essentially they tried to just bulldozer over him rather than negotiate.  Gah.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Spinks, you&#8217;re so sensible &#8211; don&#8217;t you realise that this is a topic for widespread hysteria, didn&#8217;t  you get the memo?</p>
<p>But I like this post a lot, especially because what irritated me particularly about the whole business (I don&#8217;t give a damn how Frost behaves, tbh) was the lack of negotiation.  I mean all it needed was for people to actually respond to him.  It doesn&#8217;t matter whether you believe it&#8217;s appropriate to sign up to an instance and not want to do all the bosses, the point is Frost gave them ample time to tell them they were doing the whole thing and let him drop.</p>
<p>Essentially they tried to just bulldozer over him rather than negotiate.  Gah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinks</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spinks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If one person wants to do them all and one does not and the rest of the group says nothing, then there is an issue bigger than trying to complete heroics a person short.&quot;

Yes, very much this. This is pretty much what I was getting at in the post -- the silent people probably just want to do whichever is least hassle. And negotiating is a hassle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If one person wants to do them all and one does not and the rest of the group says nothing, then there is an issue bigger than trying to complete heroics a person short.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, very much this. This is pretty much what I was getting at in the post &#8212; the silent people probably just want to do whichever is least hassle. And negotiating is a hassle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippet</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pippet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I understand your sentiment here, but there are really two reasons I disagree.  
1. The way the DF works is it tries to pair people that have higher ilvl gear with those that have lower ilvl gear.  You are not going to get a group of 5 people that are all in lvl187 blues (unless you pre-form it). 
2. With the availability of the badge gear from doing said heroics, you will quickly out-gear them even if you start all in quest greens.

I have done these heroics when they were shiny and new (and everyone was &quot;appropriately&quot; geared) and back then I would have been mad to get someone who was in all greens and everything was unenchanted.  I crafted all the blues and epics I could (or bought them) on my first couple 80&#039;s and I gemmed/enchanted the gear correctly too.  I was always a bit miffed when people would just ding and instantly queue up.  But now when most everyone out gears the place, I guess I don&#039;t blame them too much about queuing(sp?) in greens. 

I was not saying that they are &quot;bads that need carried by the mighty raiders&quot;.  I was facing the reality that even people who never set foot in a raid can easily get every piece of gear to be ilvl 232 and up to some at 264-270(270 being the PvP stuff).  With that and the way the DF pairs up groups, you can easily do them with 4 people.  

If you have people doing under 1k dps then they need to learn their rotations cause everyone can do that even in unenchanted leveling gear. And with a tank or healer (you are pretty much guaranteed that one of these two is over geared) doing a bit of extra dps you can easily defeat at least the heroics that weren&#039;t patched in with ICC.  Now you might have to actually follow the tactics you had to use when these places were new, but you can do them a person short.

I am not saying that demanding to not do what everyone else wants is appropriate, it should be a group consensus.  If one person wants to do them all and one does not and the rest of the group says nothing, then there is an issue bigger than trying to complete heroics a person short.  

The easiest fix as someone commented elsewhere is to make it so you can&#039;t skip any bosses.  Make it like Nexus where you have to kill them all before engaging the final boss.  

This was super long, so sorry for the wall of text.  I felt you misconstrued what I said, and if you still feel what I said warranted you feeling insulted, then I don&#039;t know how to make my point without sounding elitist.  I am trying to look at this realistically.  My statement of &quot;Plus you could easily four-man the optional bosses if a DPS leaves. If they couldn’t then he was carrying the group and they should have listened to him.&quot; was probably stated badly, but hopefully I have said it in a way that is less judgmental.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I understand your sentiment here, but there are really two reasons I disagree.<br />
1. The way the DF works is it tries to pair people that have higher ilvl gear with those that have lower ilvl gear.  You are not going to get a group of 5 people that are all in lvl187 blues (unless you pre-form it).<br />
2. With the availability of the badge gear from doing said heroics, you will quickly out-gear them even if you start all in quest greens.</p>
<p>I have done these heroics when they were shiny and new (and everyone was &#8220;appropriately&#8221; geared) and back then I would have been mad to get someone who was in all greens and everything was unenchanted.  I crafted all the blues and epics I could (or bought them) on my first couple 80&#8242;s and I gemmed/enchanted the gear correctly too.  I was always a bit miffed when people would just ding and instantly queue up.  But now when most everyone out gears the place, I guess I don&#8217;t blame them too much about queuing(sp?) in greens. </p>
<p>I was not saying that they are &#8220;bads that need carried by the mighty raiders&#8221;.  I was facing the reality that even people who never set foot in a raid can easily get every piece of gear to be ilvl 232 and up to some at 264-270(270 being the PvP stuff).  With that and the way the DF pairs up groups, you can easily do them with 4 people.  </p>
<p>If you have people doing under 1k dps then they need to learn their rotations cause everyone can do that even in unenchanted leveling gear. And with a tank or healer (you are pretty much guaranteed that one of these two is over geared) doing a bit of extra dps you can easily defeat at least the heroics that weren&#8217;t patched in with ICC.  Now you might have to actually follow the tactics you had to use when these places were new, but you can do them a person short.</p>
<p>I am not saying that demanding to not do what everyone else wants is appropriate, it should be a group consensus.  If one person wants to do them all and one does not and the rest of the group says nothing, then there is an issue bigger than trying to complete heroics a person short.  </p>
<p>The easiest fix as someone commented elsewhere is to make it so you can&#8217;t skip any bosses.  Make it like Nexus where you have to kill them all before engaging the final boss.  </p>
<p>This was super long, so sorry for the wall of text.  I felt you misconstrued what I said, and if you still feel what I said warranted you feeling insulted, then I don&#8217;t know how to make my point without sounding elitist.  I am trying to look at this realistically.  My statement of &#8220;Plus you could easily four-man the optional bosses if a DPS leaves. If they couldn’t then he was carrying the group and they should have listened to him.&#8221; was probably stated badly, but hopefully I have said it in a way that is less judgmental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhii</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Plus you could easily four-man the optional bosses if a DPS leaves. If they couldn’t then he was carrying the group and they should have listened to him.&quot;

Or it&#039;s a situation where they&#039;re actually producing the level of damage that the instance is tuned for and they actually need a third dps player. 

I know that rarely happens in wow, but it&#039;s not a straight up dichotomy between &quot;they could faceroll it with 4&quot; or &quot;they&#039;re bads who should beg for carries from the mighty raider&quot; and frankly I think it&#039;s rather insulting to suggest it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Plus you could easily four-man the optional bosses if a DPS leaves. If they couldn’t then he was carrying the group and they should have listened to him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or it&#8217;s a situation where they&#8217;re actually producing the level of damage that the instance is tuned for and they actually need a third dps player. </p>
<p>I know that rarely happens in wow, but it&#8217;s not a straight up dichotomy between &#8220;they could faceroll it with 4&#8243; or &#8220;they&#8217;re bads who should beg for carries from the mighty raider&#8221; and frankly I think it&#8217;s rather insulting to suggest it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiritusRex</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpiritusRex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then politely ask the group to wait for your return.  Should they be unwilling to or if you anticipate that you are going to be longer than a reasonable amount of time, drop group.  I have two young ones myself so I totally get what it&#039;s like to wait 20+ mins as a DpS to finally get into a group and then have to drop group because the youngest one wakes up from a nap and &quot;needs&quot; his Daddy.  However, I&#039;m also mature enough to know that I don&#039;t have the right to impose upon others the intrusions of my real life into their gaming life.  In my life, gaming is but a facet of who I am - way down the list below husband, father and career professional, and to the extent that one of those three things above it on the list requires my attention, then those extra badges just became unimportant to me.  There is always time to chase those pixels and I truly think that if people were more considerate of others, we&#039;d all be much happier.  A little naive, I know, but what can I say - I&#039;m an optimist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then politely ask the group to wait for your return.  Should they be unwilling to or if you anticipate that you are going to be longer than a reasonable amount of time, drop group.  I have two young ones myself so I totally get what it&#8217;s like to wait 20+ mins as a DpS to finally get into a group and then have to drop group because the youngest one wakes up from a nap and &#8220;needs&#8221; his Daddy.  However, I&#8217;m also mature enough to know that I don&#8217;t have the right to impose upon others the intrusions of my real life into their gaming life.  In my life, gaming is but a facet of who I am &#8211; way down the list below husband, father and career professional, and to the extent that one of those three things above it on the list requires my attention, then those extra badges just became unimportant to me.  There is always time to chase those pixels and I truly think that if people were more considerate of others, we&#8217;d all be much happier.  A little naive, I know, but what can I say &#8211; I&#8217;m an optimist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tesh</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And if you&#039;re waiting in the queue for longer than you expect and the kids are waking up, what then?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you&#8217;re waiting in the queue for longer than you expect and the kids are waking up, what then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiritusRex</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpiritusRex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This whole thing has me confused.  I mean, isn&#039;t the point of signing up for an instance the understanding that one is signing up to complete it?  When a person signs up...wait let me rephrase that.  When I sign up via LFD, my intention is to complete the instance.  Why else would I be signing up?  To get badges or points or whatever just to to get gear?  Seriously?  What&#039;s the point of getting gear if you don&#039;t have any idea on how to use it?  Perhaps if more people went into instances to not just jump on the gear conveyor belt (in the hopes of getting that leet gear score), but, rather, to actually practice their skills, we&#039;d all be better off.  Here&#039;s a pro-tip, the better you are with the skills of your toon, the more raids you&#039;re going to find yourself being a part of.  Further, if one happens to be on the same server and you don&#039;t act like a moron, you might just find yourself being invited to bigger and better things.  Of course, if you think you are bigger and better than the game and think the world should bow to your wishes, you are a hopeless egomaniac and I&#039;ve got no interest in being grouped with you anyways.  (all of the you&#039;s herein are intended euphemistically and are not intended to be miscontrued as being directed at Spinks)

I guess what I&#039;m trying to say is, if you don&#039;t have the time to do the whole deal and polish your skill set, then don&#039;t friggin&#039; sign up in the first place!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole thing has me confused.  I mean, isn&#8217;t the point of signing up for an instance the understanding that one is signing up to complete it?  When a person signs up&#8230;wait let me rephrase that.  When I sign up via LFD, my intention is to complete the instance.  Why else would I be signing up?  To get badges or points or whatever just to to get gear?  Seriously?  What&#8217;s the point of getting gear if you don&#8217;t have any idea on how to use it?  Perhaps if more people went into instances to not just jump on the gear conveyor belt (in the hopes of getting that leet gear score), but, rather, to actually practice their skills, we&#8217;d all be better off.  Here&#8217;s a pro-tip, the better you are with the skills of your toon, the more raids you&#8217;re going to find yourself being a part of.  Further, if one happens to be on the same server and you don&#8217;t act like a moron, you might just find yourself being invited to bigger and better things.  Of course, if you think you are bigger and better than the game and think the world should bow to your wishes, you are a hopeless egomaniac and I&#8217;ve got no interest in being grouped with you anyways.  (all of the you&#8217;s herein are intended euphemistically and are not intended to be miscontrued as being directed at Spinks)</p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is, if you don&#8217;t have the time to do the whole deal and polish your skill set, then don&#8217;t friggin&#8217; sign up in the first place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinks</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spinks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;They should just construct the instances so all the bosses need to be killed for the credit.&quot;

Yeah, I&#039;m fully expecting this to be the case in Cataclysm. I haven&#039;t actually seen the beta so no idea if it&#039;s true though.

And I personally am quite easy about how many bosses we kill when tanking an instance, it&#039;s no skin off my nose if people want a full run. But since the only bonus is a few points and some blue gear which pretty much no one wants, I don&#039;t really feel inclined to press the point if someone is really keen to skip some.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They should just construct the instances so all the bosses need to be killed for the credit.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m fully expecting this to be the case in Cataclysm. I haven&#8217;t actually seen the beta so no idea if it&#8217;s true though.</p>
<p>And I personally am quite easy about how many bosses we kill when tanking an instance, it&#8217;s no skin off my nose if people want a full run. But since the only bonus is a few points and some blue gear which pretty much no one wants, I don&#8217;t really feel inclined to press the point if someone is really keen to skip some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinks</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spinks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also only 4 letters :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also only 4 letters <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinks</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/when-hunters-go-bad-the-problem-with-non-negotiated-instance-groups/#comment-12080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spinks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=4816#comment-12080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have agreed with you about expected behaviour for most of this expansion, but right now I really don&#039;t think most people zone into OK and expect a full clear.

On the other hand, I really disagree with zoning in and announcing you don&#039;t have time for a full run. If that was the case, you could have queued specifically for the shorter instances -- if you want the random bonus then don&#039;t whine if you get a random dungeon you don&#039;t like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have agreed with you about expected behaviour for most of this expansion, but right now I really don&#8217;t think most people zone into OK and expect a full clear.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I really disagree with zoning in and announcing you don&#8217;t have time for a full run. If that was the case, you could have queued specifically for the shorter instances &#8212; if you want the random bonus then don&#8217;t whine if you get a random dungeon you don&#8217;t like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
