<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Antisocial: That word doesn&#8217;t mean what you think it means</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/</link>
	<description>MMOs and game design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:09:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ironyca</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ironyca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read through Tobolds post and all the comments, mostly because I couldn&#039;t believe what I was reading. 

I ended up commenting at the end, that I suspected Tobold was trolling us all, but then I see him mentioning his whole idea about social responsibility in another post, and I guess he wasn&#039;t kidding afterall..... 

I found the whole thing so blantantly flawed, and the comments so full of clever counter arguments and insight.

I wonder how Tobold would tackle the concept of playing for fun in his theory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read through Tobolds post and all the comments, mostly because I couldn&#8217;t believe what I was reading. </p>
<p>I ended up commenting at the end, that I suspected Tobold was trolling us all, but then I see him mentioning his whole idea about social responsibility in another post, and I guess he wasn&#8217;t kidding afterall&#8230;.. </p>
<p>I found the whole thing so blantantly flawed, and the comments so full of clever counter arguments and insight.</p>
<p>I wonder how Tobold would tackle the concept of playing for fun in his theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nugget</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nugget]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed! Gevlon is being scarily socially responsible, if we&#039;re going to talk about that. O.o

Whoda thunk!

*salute goblin*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed! Gevlon is being scarily socially responsible, if we&#8217;re going to talk about that. O.o</p>
<p>Whoda thunk!</p>
<p>*salute goblin*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nugget</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nugget]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the difference in tanks that Tufva is referring to here is definitely there. But there&#039;s one HUGE problem, which relates to all the stuff said so far.

Usually, it&#039;s a difference that only the healer notices. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the difference in tanks that Tufva is referring to here is definitely there. But there&#8217;s one HUGE problem, which relates to all the stuff said so far.</p>
<p>Usually, it&#8217;s a difference that only the healer notices. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinks</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spinks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Makes perfect sense. I also think that maybe it is socially responsible for good dps to queue as dps, given how many poor ones there are around.

The other thing ofc is that even if you did tank, people would raise hell if you rolled on dps gear so what&#039;s the motivation anyway?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes perfect sense. I also think that maybe it is socially responsible for good dps to queue as dps, given how many poor ones there are around.</p>
<p>The other thing ofc is that even if you did tank, people would raise hell if you rolled on dps gear so what&#8217;s the motivation anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladyerinia</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ladyerinia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 03:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate tanking. I hate it, I hate it, I hate it. And I&#039;m a Death Knight. This means I can tank if I want to. I do not think I am shirking my social responsibility by refusing to queue as a tank.  I&#039;d rather have a 40 minute queue as a dps and do the job I actually enjoy, than have a 1 sec queue as tank (and a barely competent one) and do a job I hate. 

In fact, I think it is socially responsible of me to queue as a DPS! Why would I do a job I&#039;m barely competent at? How is that responsible? When I don&#039;t queue as tank, you don&#039;t wipe through any fault of mine!

However, I do disagree about the healing meters. The healers in my guild compete to get the highest on the healing meters. DPS is not king to them :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate tanking. I hate it, I hate it, I hate it. And I&#8217;m a Death Knight. This means I can tank if I want to. I do not think I am shirking my social responsibility by refusing to queue as a tank.  I&#8217;d rather have a 40 minute queue as a dps and do the job I actually enjoy, than have a 1 sec queue as tank (and a barely competent one) and do a job I hate. </p>
<p>In fact, I think it is socially responsible of me to queue as a DPS! Why would I do a job I&#8217;m barely competent at? How is that responsible? When I don&#8217;t queue as tank, you don&#8217;t wipe through any fault of mine!</p>
<p>However, I do disagree about the healing meters. The healers in my guild compete to get the highest on the healing meters. DPS is not king to them <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lujanera</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lujanera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...be happy if they’re good enough.&quot;

Good enough for -what-, though?

I mostly tank and heal, so I have a fair number of opportunities to observe dps and their various failure modes.  Sometimes I come away from the LFD experience impressed, but more often I&#039;m badly disappointed.

I agree that expectations should be set accordingly, but according to what?  Some players expect perfection, which is clearly too high a standard.  The LFD system, by contrast, expects only an average ilevel of 329, which seems to me a bit low in the absence of skills.  I think it would be reasonable to expect players in the queue to have some demonstrated ability to move out of fire, move into buffs, run an effective rotation, use a variety of abilities, and switch targets.  These are (some of) the skills necessary to complete the content for which the group was composed.

Random things will happen when a random group of players is assembled, but the frequency with which a heroics group has one dps doing &lt;6k dps suggests to me that the system has scope for improvement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;be happy if they’re good enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good enough for -what-, though?</p>
<p>I mostly tank and heal, so I have a fair number of opportunities to observe dps and their various failure modes.  Sometimes I come away from the LFD experience impressed, but more often I&#8217;m badly disappointed.</p>
<p>I agree that expectations should be set accordingly, but according to what?  Some players expect perfection, which is clearly too high a standard.  The LFD system, by contrast, expects only an average ilevel of 329, which seems to me a bit low in the absence of skills.  I think it would be reasonable to expect players in the queue to have some demonstrated ability to move out of fire, move into buffs, run an effective rotation, use a variety of abilities, and switch targets.  These are (some of) the skills necessary to complete the content for which the group was composed.</p>
<p>Random things will happen when a random group of players is assembled, but the frequency with which a heroics group has one dps doing &lt;6k dps suggests to me that the system has scope for improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azaael</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azaael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see both sides of the story. I&#039;m a MS DPSer and OS tank. Now, when Cata hit, it was close to the holidays.

Within a week, we had quite a few folks able to do Heroics. However-our tank situation was lacking, due to said holidays. We have several MS tanks, but many were not able to really play often due to winter vacations, family, and the like. 

Thus, I would not group-by my own choice-with other tanks. Because we were trying to get guild runs going, I was a perfectly acceptable tank gear wise. Say we had 10 people online, but only 1 tank. If I grouped up in my MS with one group, the other group would be not only left with needing to LFD, but one person would have to be left out on top of it. Helping guildies, IMO, is a good thing to do. I like tanking though-I wouldn&#039;t have a tank OS if I did. (DPS are not FORCED to take an OS they dislike in our guild. It&#039;s highly encouraged though hybrids do take a different OS for raid flexibility. Tanks are required to have offspecs in priority of healer-ranged-melee.) 

This goes for raids as well; If someone can&#039;t make it and the raid&#039;s short, it&#039;s just a good gesture if someone steps up and takes up the missing role. I admit I&#039;d frown at someone who would absolutely refuse to use their OS(which they geared up) and let the raid be cancelled because of it.

Again, I see both sides-some people like DPSing, and don&#039;t like tanking or healing. But at the same time, it&#039;s a known fact-queues for tanking and healing are much shorter than queues for DPS. If a DPSer has a heroic viable OS, but insists on always queueing as DPS and KEEPS COMPLAINING about the long queues, yes, I would say something to them. 

In other words, it&#039;s perfectly okay to be a hybrid but only take DPS specs. But by doing so, IMO, you give up the right to complain about long queues. Want a shorter queue? Go as a tank or healer. It&#039;s a choice-a spec you prefer and a long queue, or a spec you dont&#039; quite prefer but a short one. Sadly, if you&#039;re a DPS preferred person you can&#039;t have both. (This goes for pure DPSers as well-I mean, DPS has a long queue.) This is where i can see the plight of the pure DPSers however-they CAN&#039;T queue as anything else, and due to the fact so many hybrids also play as DPS, their queues are longer. 

It&#039;s a back and forth thing and IMO there is no real right answer as both sides feel entitled. It&#039;s a bad situation on both sides; DPSers who play hybrids who dont like non DPS specs are made to feel guilty and that&#039;s not good, and DPSers who WOULD play another spec aren&#039;t able to due to the class design. The only way I could see a possible fix to this would be to really-redesign/scratch the &#039;holy trinity&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see both sides of the story. I&#8217;m a MS DPSer and OS tank. Now, when Cata hit, it was close to the holidays.</p>
<p>Within a week, we had quite a few folks able to do Heroics. However-our tank situation was lacking, due to said holidays. We have several MS tanks, but many were not able to really play often due to winter vacations, family, and the like. </p>
<p>Thus, I would not group-by my own choice-with other tanks. Because we were trying to get guild runs going, I was a perfectly acceptable tank gear wise. Say we had 10 people online, but only 1 tank. If I grouped up in my MS with one group, the other group would be not only left with needing to LFD, but one person would have to be left out on top of it. Helping guildies, IMO, is a good thing to do. I like tanking though-I wouldn&#8217;t have a tank OS if I did. (DPS are not FORCED to take an OS they dislike in our guild. It&#8217;s highly encouraged though hybrids do take a different OS for raid flexibility. Tanks are required to have offspecs in priority of healer-ranged-melee.) </p>
<p>This goes for raids as well; If someone can&#8217;t make it and the raid&#8217;s short, it&#8217;s just a good gesture if someone steps up and takes up the missing role. I admit I&#8217;d frown at someone who would absolutely refuse to use their OS(which they geared up) and let the raid be cancelled because of it.</p>
<p>Again, I see both sides-some people like DPSing, and don&#8217;t like tanking or healing. But at the same time, it&#8217;s a known fact-queues for tanking and healing are much shorter than queues for DPS. If a DPSer has a heroic viable OS, but insists on always queueing as DPS and KEEPS COMPLAINING about the long queues, yes, I would say something to them. </p>
<p>In other words, it&#8217;s perfectly okay to be a hybrid but only take DPS specs. But by doing so, IMO, you give up the right to complain about long queues. Want a shorter queue? Go as a tank or healer. It&#8217;s a choice-a spec you prefer and a long queue, or a spec you dont&#8217; quite prefer but a short one. Sadly, if you&#8217;re a DPS preferred person you can&#8217;t have both. (This goes for pure DPSers as well-I mean, DPS has a long queue.) This is where i can see the plight of the pure DPSers however-they CAN&#8217;T queue as anything else, and due to the fact so many hybrids also play as DPS, their queues are longer. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a back and forth thing and IMO there is no real right answer as both sides feel entitled. It&#8217;s a bad situation on both sides; DPSers who play hybrids who dont like non DPS specs are made to feel guilty and that&#8217;s not good, and DPSers who WOULD play another spec aren&#8217;t able to due to the class design. The only way I could see a possible fix to this would be to really-redesign/scratch the &#8216;holy trinity&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rurjaos</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rurjaos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When undergeared or don&#039;t have the necessary CC, you have to improvise... some trashpack have real nasty opening-dmg, so splitting that up isn&#039;t as crazy as it sounds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When undergeared or don&#8217;t have the necessary CC, you have to improvise&#8230; some trashpack have real nasty opening-dmg, so splitting that up isn&#8217;t as crazy as it sounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kring</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; If you simply pass on taking on challenges as they are
&gt; because they’ll be easier later, that’s an accessibility
&gt; issue

That&#039;s not what I meant.

The Cata heroics are challenging once, maybe twice. After that it&#039;s just an hour long grind for 70 valor points. If you stop running them at this point and wait for your gear you don&#039;t pass on challenges. You pass on grinding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; If you simply pass on taking on challenges as they are<br />
&gt; because they’ll be easier later, that’s an accessibility<br />
&gt; issue</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what I meant.</p>
<p>The Cata heroics are challenging once, maybe twice. After that it&#8217;s just an hour long grind for 70 valor points. If you stop running them at this point and wait for your gear you don&#8217;t pass on challenges. You pass on grinding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question of the Day: How many mounts do you really need? &#171; Welcome to Spinksville!</title>
		<link>http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/antisocial-that-word-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-13247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Question of the Day: How many mounts do you really need? &#171; Welcome to Spinksville!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spinksville.wordpress.com/?p=5123#comment-13247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Comments        &#171; Antisocial: That word doesn&#8217;t mean what you think it&#160;means [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments        &laquo; Antisocial: That word doesn&#8217;t mean what you think it&nbsp;means [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
