I’d like to point out that every one of your responses to my posts included an ad hominem.

Being excellent to people who are different than you is fantastic, but ignores the fact the society is composed by other people than you (general you) when societal inequalities are being referenced. While I can offer support, I can’t fight all inequalities by imposing my voice and power on someone else’s struggle.

I got a little rambly here, since its the first time I articulated my feelings in writing, so I hope my perspective came across.

Another interesting fact that they mention in that study is men memorizing pictures “as is” (by using right-brain structures for item placement and spatial relations in memorization), while women used left-brain structures more, perhaps pointing to semi-verbal deconstruction of scene while memorizing it.

Though you can’t get any real conclusions from that without trying to confirm something you already consider to be true.

–
We cannot change biological differences, but sometimes we can help in other ways when those differences seem to prevent people from achieving their dreams.
We can and do change social norms (differences) constantly.
Those two things often intersect in strange ways.

For example, maternity leave. The point of maternity leave is that women can be mother _and_ remain being productive member of society without losing her job.
Then, as managers begin to optimize workplace, even small disruption of job/profits with maternity leave seems to be too much. So they don’t hire women – not always main reason, but one of reasons anyway. And so women cannot be productive members of society in those spots.
So it seems for equality, ability and willingness of society to tolerate some inefficiencies is required. It has non-zero cost – but same goes for having unhappy people in your society.

Of course, I haven’t mapped out the entire body of study that deals with neural networks based on biological differences, but I don’t think the intense emotions you feel frequently relates to how often you physically express emotions

Study also postulates that you may (“may” being key word here) be able to control situation and make them equal in the end by using stimulus that create same emotional response in both men and women – but that doesn’t happen naturally, nor does abstract shows in which ways you could change stimulus to make them equal.

Study seems to support women being more emotional in recall of long-term memory. As such, extra care is warranted (as with any other cognitive/behavioural biases) as long as you want to remain objective and unbiased.

” It may be possible to manipulate the cognitive style of subjects through instruction or different types of stimuli and thus shift the observable laterality pattern as a function of task rather than sex,” is how the study ends.

Here’s what you said (you seem to have forgotten):
“If there is one difference between men and women it is taht(sic) men can argue facts without emotion while women take any argument about facts as a personal attack against women.”

And please, the quote above is from some consulting group (http://www.bixlerconsulting.com). You really ARE quoting random stuff on the internet!

“Of course you could easily have goggled any of this but I bet its much easier for you to just name call and claim there is no proof.”
- Nono, the burden of truth is on you, to prove your OWN statement.

Please Goodmongo, it’s getting ridiculous.